dida4g wrote:There is a time posted on here somewhere, done @crail iirc.tobiasnugent wrote:What about 1.4s!?
Edit..adamdunn5 - 16.1 @ 83.6mph
Come on all you owners of 1.4's Step up
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
My bad, I missed a couple of words.Tahir wrote:Nope, Honda's.dida4g wrote:We may as well include kit cars and Mini's weighing 600Kg.
My point is there's too many variations so I kept it simple.dida4g wrote:We may as well include Honda engined kit cars and Mini's weighing 600Kg.
You could argue, BUt a B20 with 84.5mm bore is still under 2000ccdida4g wrote:My bad, I missed a couple of words.Tahir wrote:Nope, Honda's.dida4g wrote:We may as well include kit cars and Mini's weighing 600Kg.
My point is there's too many variations so I kept it simple.dida4g wrote:We may as well include Honda engined kit cars and Mini's weighing 600Kg.
Some could argue that Daz's B20 is over 2000cc. At York that would put you in a different class.
But hey, what do I know.
Farce? you're right.Tahir wrote:12.997![]()
The N/A "Benchmark" was a farce all that time then.
dida4g wrote:
It's a Benchmak as far as 4G's and Crx's are concerned.
This thread is useless without timing slips, pics and spec list.dida4g wrote:I never included CPL's 2.0 n/a Civic that ran a 12.5 in 2007.
So let me get this straight.Tahir wrote:
Those that neeeeeeeed to keep quoting figures/times for willy waving or whatever, then fair enough as long as it keeps them happy who cares? Not me.