4th Generation Honda Civic Owners Club Main Forum.
Soldier456
Lvl5! Turbo Charged Posting
Posts: 1282 Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Surrey
Post
by Soldier456 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:16 am
I had a GL a while back, and loved that thing alot! I just want to know if anyone has gone from a GL to a 1.6 16v, and what the difference was all round?
Soldier456
Lvl5! Turbo Charged Posting
Posts: 1282 Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Surrey
Post
by Soldier456 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:18 am
Also how would you compare a 1.6 civic to a 1.6 CRX? Am i rite in saying the civic would hand le better?
browndk04
Lvl3 Street Racer
Posts: 352 Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:51 pm
Location: Scottish Borders
Post
by browndk04 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:10 am
I had a gl before my 16v. To be honest theres not much difference except rear brakes, injection and more power
The power difference is fun!
nick_civic
Lvl7! Post Whore y0!
Posts: 2483 Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:52 am
Location: PANGAEA
Post
by nick_civic » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:16 am
1.6 all the way y0!!
i had 2 GL's then went d16 and they're so much quicker and they sound better
VTEC FTW
1991 Honda Civic GL (90hp)
1991 Honda Civic 1.6i-16 (130hp)
1996 Toyota Levin ae111 (163hp)
1992 Mazda RX7 fd3s (261hp tuned to 300hp)
widowmaker
Moderator
Posts: 8097 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:46 pm
Post
by widowmaker » Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:12 pm
Its true that the 16-16 is faster in standard form, however it is quite easy and fairly cheap to get 125 + bhp out of a GL.
Watch this space
No longer on the 'sucker list'
NickD
Moderator
Posts: 645 Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:13 pm
Post
by NickD » Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:49 pm
Soldier456 wrote: Also how would you compare a 1.6 civic to a 1.6 CRX? Am i rite in saying the civic would hand le better?
I've got both, and no, not really.
They both handle well, the Civic is more prone to lift off oversteer but it's easy to control, the CRX is less willing to go sideways, but goes quicker when it does.
streaker
Lvl6! Danger to manifold!
Posts: 1930 Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Tyneside
Post
by streaker » Wed Sep 24, 2008 5:41 pm
I'd definatly say the CRX is more nimble.
Especially in the earlir 88's, they had rear wheel steering - sort of
simpo
Lvl3 Street Racer
Posts: 411 Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:04 am
Location: southwest
Post
by simpo » Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:02 pm
Soldier456 wrote: Also how would you compare a 1.6 civic to a 1.6 CRX? Am i rite in saying the civic would hand le better?
i have had both i found the civic is well better found the crx slow. also had two gl's but once you go 1.6 i 16v you wont wanna go back
Soldier456
Lvl5! Turbo Charged Posting
Posts: 1282 Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Surrey
Post
by Soldier456 » Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:58 am
Nice one guys, but you would say the civic is quicker than the crx equivalent?
jinjur
Lvl1 Newbie
Posts: 88 Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:36 pm
Post
by jinjur » Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:43 am
I would
Havent met one yet that stood a chance........but hey, we are talking about vader here
JJ
Andy @ Belfast @ Northern Ireland
=============================
1990 Civic 16i-16 - matt black - evil
streaker
Lvl6! Danger to manifold!
Posts: 1930 Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Tyneside
Post
by streaker » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:54 am
Soldier456 wrote: Nice one guys, but you would say the civic is quicker than the crx equivalent?
I wouldnt. Exactly the same drive train
merce
4GUK Donator
Posts: 1668 Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 10:14 am
Location: Lancaster
Contact:
Post
by merce » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:11 am
welcome back Jinjur!
There should be a grudge battle - CRX's vs Civics and 16i16s vs GL. Didn't Dida mention another york raceway meet.
It would be much more interesting to watch.
EE9 CVC
Lvl7! Post Whore y0!
Posts: 3481 Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Portrush - NI or on Indian Empress
Post
by EE9 CVC » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:15 am
IMO the VT civc is less twichy and more stable than a VT CRX but both are pretty equal in terms of speed as they basicallt the same.
widowmaker
Moderator
Posts: 8097 Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 10:46 pm
Post
by widowmaker » Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:47 am
16i16s vs GL in a grudge match
That would be fun
No longer on the 'sucker list'
Oldskool J-EDM
Lvl7! Post Whore y0!
Posts: 3755 Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Warrington or Winchester
Contact:
Post
by Oldskool J-EDM » Fri Sep 26, 2008 10:00 pm
I think you'll find that the CRX and Civic are just slightly different ways of doing the same thing, as Streaker said, with the same drive train. There isn't really anything to choose between the two performance wise in stock form in 'real-world' conditions. I would suspect that you could loose more weight on a Civic diet rather than a CRX one as CRX's have alot of glass, and not as much interior to junk as is possible with a Civic. A 16-16 vs. GL shoot out...hahaha...would be entertaining Widowmaker.
D14A1 EC9 GL
127WHP@6200rpm Bisimoto
4GUK-Resident-Pic-Whore!